Please contact customerservices lexology. I am sure that from time to time we have all come across the vexed question of backdating documents.
Is it legal to comply with the request or must it always be refused outright? Alternatively, is there a way of legally trying to achieve the required objective? For example, if a seller had sold his house in December then the seller could have taken advantage of certain tax benefits. However, Backdating contracts australia weather only realizes this in January and so wishes backdate the document to December. The event did not happen during the time period required for the benefit so an attempt is being made to pretend that it did.
This is a fraud on the tax authorities, a criminal offence and is likely to get the lawyer who prepared the document disciplined by his regulator and possibly also charged as a co-conspirator.
For obvious reasons, any request to Backdating contracts australia weather a document for these reasons should be flatly turned down. However, an explanation often given by the person wanting to backdate the document is that the document is merely meant to reflect an Backdating contracts australia weather agreement that has already been made and that this is just a way of documenting it.
In theory, this would appear on the face of it to be a reasonable request, as it is just a private arrangement between two parties. The argument is obviously not valid if the transaction is one which is required by law to be in writing such as a transfer of land.
This is not an agreement that could have been made orally. However, even if it is an agreement that could have been made orally the lawyer preparing the agreement has no way of knowing whether that is actually the case and that the agreement to be fully documented by him is the one that was reached at the earlier date.
He also has no way of knowing whether the backdating will be scrutinized by a regulatory authority or even a Court. Does he need to check to see whether that was actually the case or can he take an ostrich-like position and put his head in the sand and not any questions?
What confirmation of the earlier agreement did the client or the company for which the client and lawyer works provide? Is the client a longstanding one who has always acted properly in the past? How well does the lawyer know the client? These are questions he will probably be asked by the judge or regulator if things go wrong and to which he will need convincing answers.
There are some ways in which the lawyer can give himself some protection in agreeing to such a request but they are not foolproof. For example, if one wishes to backdate a document for the purposes of recording an earlier oral agreement, it should nevertheless still be drafted in such a way so as to avoid giving the incorrect impression that it was actually signed on the date stated.
The best way to achieve this is to state openly in Backdating contracts australia weather document that it is recording an earlier oral agreement made on, and so is with effect from, a particular date and then date it the actual date it was signed. The position is then clear to all who subsequently look at the document.
However, the actual date of signature should nevertheless be set out in the attestation clause at the end to avoid any claims that the document "Backdating contracts australia weather" intentionally misleading.
So Backdating contracts australia weather can be seen, the issue of backdating can be a contentious one. It is not straight forward and can give problems to any lawyer that agrees to backdate a document, even if he makes it clear on the document that it is backdated, as he must be careful to make sure that he knows why the document is being backdated and that it is being done for a legitimate reason. If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries lexology.
The selection feature during registration helps in increasing the relevance of the content of the emails.